The recent UN climate summit in Azerbaijan sparked a debate in the European Parliament, with concerns raised over the EU’s ability to achieve its ambitious climate goals. The environment policy lead for the EPP, Peter Liese, expressed doubts about the feasibility of a 90% emissions cut by 2040, a target proposed by climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra. Liese emphasized the need for realistic interim targets and thorough impact assessments.
While some far-right politicians in the European Parliament cast doubt on the reality of climate change, Liese described it as one of the greatest challenges of our generation. The negotiations at COP29 were also scrutinized, with criticism of the financial package agreed upon, and concerns raised about the COP presidency being given to a country dependent on fossil fuel extraction.
Several MEPs, including Mohamed Chahim and Lena Schilling, criticized the slow progress in funding climate initiatives and called attention to human rights abuses in Azerbaijan. Schilling, who met with Azerbaijani dissidents during the summit, accused the regime of using the event to “greenwash” its image.
In conclusion, Hoekstra emphasized the importance of following the scientific consensus on climate change, warning that the cost of inaction would be far greater than the cost of taking action today. The debate highlighted the challenges and divisions within the European Parliament when it comes to addressing climate change and achieving sustainable policies.
Source
Photo credit www.euronews.com
