In a recent debate in the UK parliament, MP Kim Leadbeater defended her assisted dying bill against claims that it could lead to a slippery slope. She argues that the UK can look at 31 jurisdictions around the world where similar laws are in place and that the scope of the bill cannot be expanded by the courts. Leadbeater insists that the bill includes safeguards to prevent coercion and ensure that only terminally ill individuals can access assisted dying.
On the other hand, MP Danny Kruger opposes the bill, arguing that it could lead to a shift in societal values and a lack of focus on palliative care. He raises concerns about the potential for individuals to coerce themselves into ending their lives and suggests that parliament should be the safeguard against harm. Kruger calls for a more thorough debate on end-of-life care and palliative services.
During the debate, Leadbeater also addresses concerns raised by other MPs regarding the impact of the bill on vulnerable individuals, such as those with learning disabilities. She expresses openness to toughening the wording of the bill to protect these individuals and ensure their rights are upheld.
Ultimately, the debate surrounding the assisted dying bill highlights the complexities and moral dilemmas associated with end-of-life care. MPs are urged to carefully consider the provisions of the bill and the potential implications before making a decision on its second reading.
Source
Photo credit www.theguardian.com
