As Americans shift their focus from Thanksgiving to Christmas, the debate between buying a real or artificial Christmas tree resurfaces. Data shows that a majority of households opt for artificial trees, but there are pros and cons to each option. Real trees absorb carbon dioxide while growing and provide important habitat for wildlife. Additionally, they are 100% recyclable and can be disposed of in eco-friendly ways such as mulching. On the other hand, artificial trees are typically made from petroleum-derived plastics and are not recyclable, but their environmental impact can be offset if they are used for at least five years. Buying a second-hand artificial tree and replacing lights with energy-efficient LEDs can further reduce its carbon footprint. Ultimately, the best choice for the planet depends on how the tree is used and disposed of. Choosing to recycle a real tree or use an artificial one for multiple years can help minimize its environmental impact. Whether opting for a real or artificial tree, being mindful of disposal methods and longevity can contribute to a more sustainable holiday season.
Photo credit
www.usatoday.com
Which option is more environmentally-friendly?
Previous article![]( "Florida man arrested by State Police")
Next article![]( "Israel Advises Residents in Bordering Towns to Keep Safe Distance from Lebanon")
